If you miss any business critical scenario and want to add now, please discuss with Finance Manager first. We’ll decide about the scenario.
I think there has been a communication gap. We are NOT adding any new scenarios but we are exploring different angles/ variations of the same, which are being listed down as prescribed by KPMG consultants. For example, in our UAT scenario we have mass allocation, recurring journals, provisional journals in GL. We have already checked the functionality and the system works absolutely fine. However, we have different kinds of the stated journals, which need to be tested thoroughly for system consistency.
I think there has been a communication gap. We are NOT adding any new scenarios but we are exploring different angles/ variations of the same, which are being listed down as prescribed by KPMG consultants. For example, in our UAT scenario we have mass allocation, recurring journals, provisional journals in GL. We have already checked the functionality and the system works absolutely fine. However, we have different kinds of the stated journals, which need to be tested thoroughly for system consistency.
Finance team will complete listing down of such variations and will get it verified by CFO by Sunday, which will be shared with PMG consultants. They can then decide whether we need additional List of Values-LOVs/ any modifications in the setup. Please note that we don’t foresee any design change from the To Be at this point of time. Bottom line: NO new scenarios or change in fundamental design! J Thanks.
Yes I agree on this that this should not be part of issue register and it is OK to discuss additional angles where the functionality can be used until it is not changing the base design.
Yes I agree on this that this should not be part of issue register and it is OK to discuss additional angles where the functionality can be used until it is not changing the base design.